narnian: (➝ ( ✧  ))
❝ h a k u ❞ ([personal profile] narnian) wrote in [community profile] heretics2011-06-30 11:42 pm

TINKER TAILOR SOLDIER SPY [ icons x 56 ] KATE WINSLET [ icons x 34 ]

Because I'm a fucking lunatic sob. What is wrong with me.











o1o2o3o4
o5o6o7o8
o9o10o11o12
o13o14o15o16
o17o18o19o20
o21o22o23o24
o25o26o27o28
o29o30o31o32
o33o34o35o36
o37o38o39o40
o41o42o43o44
o45o46o47o48
o49o50o51o52
o53o54o55o56




o1o2o3o4
o5o6o7o8
o9o10o11o12
o13o14o15o16
o17o18o19o20
o21o22o23o24
o25o26o27o28
o29o30o31o32
o33o34

















Comments are love <3

Thank you for looking. o/

This may not make sense, it's early here, too. D:

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 10:23 am (UTC)(link)
...dealing with HTML/fonts tomorrow, because they make me sad in the early morning. D:


AND JUST FYI: I LOVE ALL THIS COBB-MAL THOUGHTS AND THAT YOU TYPED ALL THIS AT 6AM.

Most of this on Cobb I mostly agree with, actually. I might argue the military connection thing, but I'd say he's talented and willing to take risks/try crazy-ass-shit (Mr. Charles, inception, etc). And "fallibly passionate" most of all--with Mal and with dreams and with people. Doesn't a lot of his extractor mystique come from this very quality? (Where Arthur would prefer to play politic, Cobb goes straight out and asks Saito: "What's the most resilient parasite?" and lists horrible, insidious things. He's not unaware of the effect, but his passion is carrying him along and he expects it to work on whoever he's talking to as well. That's how he sells Mr. Charles to Fisher--his own passion and confidence.) But these fixations--based in passion/confidence (heedless, dangerous confidence in some cases) are his downfall as well.

BUT, IDK, I still feel like we meet him at an awkward time. If I had met the passionate, trainwreck (literally) waiting to happen of pre-Inception? I think I could have really gotten into the character more. But as someone already so fixated, so intent that he's in these circular, purgatory-like mental processes? Hmm.

YAY, ON TO READING THE NEXT LARGER PART. AKSNLAKFA;

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe so. At the very least she's complicit, because it's not like he put a gun to her head. BUT he's easy to blame, because he blames himself?

I don't know, I still think if I had 'met' Dom at any other time, I would have been more into him. Unreliable, selfish narrator/perspectives do it for me, but idk asdjasks;adlk it's--I just--I can't.

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
BUT BUT BUT

She "chose" to forget as a way of coping. And can she really be blamed in any way for that? If that's how you have to keep hold of your sanity? Cobb makes the opposite choice and selfishly tries to impose/force his view of how to deal with the situation on her on his own terms. That's pretty jacked up even if she was lost in her own head. SOOOOO, I'm not going to buy the 'she CHOSE to forget' argument. Not to VILLAINIZE him (because in the end they're both just a touch egocentric in a partnership that requires so much more of them both and it didn't turn out well for either involved) but it's not like choosing to forget is even rooted in a fault of her own. It's just I-don't-want-a-brain-of-scrambled-egg insurance.

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
" That was the wrong choice when you have KIDS up above."
But not everyone has the mental fortitude to just deal with an unspecified amount of time in limbo! Kids or no, if one doesn't escape with mental health in tact...what good would it be anyway? D:

The WRONG CHOICE was, if you want to get technical, when BOTH PARENTS decided to experiment with dangerous dreamshare TOGETHER. It's a part of that whole fixation/mutual integration thing. They were wrapped in themselves (as individuals and as a couple) long before these concerns.

(By the way, just arguing because I find this fascinating and I have fun with it. Not to be obnoxious or 'I'M RIGHT' about it. It's just interesting to see the different angles people think of idk?)
Edited 2011-07-01 22:26 (UTC)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I just can't see self-preservation as something for which someone should/can be blamed! And if she didn't escape with her sanity, I WONDER WHY THAT IS. I really can't make the jump to blaming her at all for Dom's decision to MESS WITH HER HEAD. I mean, that's just...really, really wrong no matter how it's sliced. So, if we're going to assign blame, I would go with: BOTH EQUALLY for experimenting together without safeguards in the first place, Mal for choosing to forget without Dom (independent decision making in a codependent relationship = always bad), and Dom for choosing to wake her by force through accidental inception.

Honestly, their whole relationship is creepy and awesome. I don't really have the awe that I probably should, but I find it fascinating. I don't really have that many nitpicks on their characterization, because I haven't really haven't read all that much that really explores there characters?

...which I should probably, you know, go out of my way to fix one day. D:

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)
isjdiajdsad you said EQUAL BLAME for the accidental inception and I RAIL against that. But yes, I don't just blame Dom. (Not that I can still take him seriously in just a canon/post-canon sense either, though, mind you.)

Most of my extrapolation has been saved for Arthur and Eames. Which, yeah, probably isn't all that unusual in fandom. It's only recently that I've been branching out to consider the others: I'm super intrigued by Mal right now and starting to get curious about a post-canon Fisher?

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, yeah, I can agree to agree with that. ♥

IMO, YOU JUST NEED TO DO PICSPAMS FOR ALL OF THIS. WANT TO DISCUSS DOM PRE-CANON OR FISHER POST-CANON OR MAL ANYTIME? PICSPAM SOLVES EVERYTHING. YES, YES, YES, PLEASE.

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I'M JUST SHAMELESSLY THROWING OUT THINGS I WANT TO SEE. DON'T MIND ME. I THINK FISHER POST-CANON WOULD BE FASCINATING. BECAUSE YEAH, HE HAD ISSUES BEFORE INCEPTION. YOU COULD DO LIKE--A CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE FISHER-POST-CANON.

"DOES FISHER LOSE HIS MIND COMPLETELY? IF YES, CLICK HERE. IF NO, CLICK HERE."

kadskldasdsaldsa; It's not a secret that I adore your picspams, SO THE POSSIBILITY OF MORE, even a Dom one (kidding, kidding) makes me so PLEASED.

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
"OH GOD FISCHER AT THE MERCY OF THE MASSES"
YES. THE WORLD NEEDS SO MUCH MORE FISHER, C'MON.

dkadlkfalkdal;sda; /obnoxious

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I've spammed your poor post to 100 comments. THAT'S PRETTY OBNOXIOUS. D:

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
AHAHAHAHA. THIS ONLY HAPPENED BECAUSE OF THE GOLD STAR. WHO CAN SAY NO TO A GOLD STAR.

Seriously, though, I wouldn't have stayed up until like FOUR AM OKAY if I wasn't enjoying the conversation ashfiasfjsa;

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I think you're just slightly ahead of me? I'm a California girl, so PST. 8D;

LEVERAGE IS SO EASY WITH ME, SERIOUSLY. I JSUT. I'M EASY. If only there were something to leverage for.

Angst/Romance is pretty debatable? There have been angsty romance pieces and vice versa? I THINK so long asyou can argue that the TONE is angsty or that it has an agnsty end or ffs an ANGSTY MOMENT you're okay? (But if you need someone to look something over, I can do that. OR IS THAT CROSS-TEAM ASSOCIATION AND BANNED IDK.)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com 2011-07-01 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
AHAHAHA RESISTING NAMING THIS THREAD 'TEAM EASY' BECAUSE IT DOES SOUND SO WRONG. BUT. SO AMUSED.

Hmmmm, well, I don't see a problem with it? I'm practically a Team Angst mole anyway. No pressure/expectation, but if you ever need/want/etc. I can cheerlead/validate/beta as needed so if you ever want, you can just send anything to dialectical at livejournal dot com or throw it up in Google Docs. ♥

NOT THAT YOU NEED TO. OR WHATEVER. IT'S JUST AN OFFER, BECAUSE I CAN NEVER RESIST OFFERING HELP TO LOVELY PEOPLE.

(no subject)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com - 2011-07-01 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com - 2011-07-02 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com - 2011-07-02 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com - 2011-07-02 01:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com - 2011-07-02 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] dialectical.livejournal.com - 2011-07-02 01:39 (UTC) - Expand